Guest Post courtesy of AGOSNET:

Sweeping changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—which protects individuals with disabilities from, among other things, discrimination in employment—are almost certain to be coming soon. On June 24, 2008, the United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 3195, the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) by an overwhelming vote of 402–17. A very similar version was introduced in the Senate on August 1, 2008 (S. 3406) with 56 Senators as original co–sponsors, and over the past couple of weeks, approximately 70 Senators have signed on in support of the bill. What this means is that it appears almost certain that, when the Senate reconvenes in September, it is highly likely that the ADAAA will be passed, most likely with enough support to override a veto if the President does not ultimately support the amendments.

The ADAAA, if passed by the Senate, would likely drastically change the ADA as we currently understand it by broadening the ADA’s protections to a wider range of individuals. Supporters of the ADAAA contend that the act will restore original congressional intent of providing broad coverage to persons with disabilities. Beginning in 1999, the United States Supreme Court has issued several decisions that those who support the ADAAA believe too narrowly construed the ADA and weakened the ADA’s effect and original intent of providing broad protection to persons with physical and mental impairments that substantially limit a major life activity. Specifically, the United States Supreme Court has held that workers with disabilities who are able to effectively mitigate their impairments (for example, by the use of medications, corrective vision or hearing devices, prosthetics, and other assistive technology) are essentially not disabled—or at least not disabled enough to qualify for the ADA’s protections. These decisions and lower court decisions following them have held that certain serious conditions that one might think are disabilities—such as epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, cancer, diabetes, and cerebral palsy—are, in fact, not always disabilities. Because of the narrow interpretation of the ADA adopted by the United States Supreme Court, many plaintiffs are found not to actually be disabled. By one account, in 2007, only 3 percent of ADA plaintiffs were ultimately successfully, largely because so many of them are found not to be disabled.

The ADAAA would broaden the ADA’s reach by essentially reversing the United States Supreme Court rulings that narrowly interpret the meaning of the key phrase “substantially limits a major life activity.” The ADAAA would define disability as any actual, past, or perceived physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, and would define substantially limits a major life activity as “materially restricts a major life activity.” The ADAAA would also, for the first time, provide a list of per se major life activities. The list includes, but is not limited to, caring for oneself, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating, working, and the performance of any major bodily function. The ADAAA would also prohibit the consideration of measures that reduce the impact of an impairment on an individual. In other words, a hearing impaired person who can hear just fine with hearing aids who might not be covered under the ADA currently might well be covered if the ADAAA is passed into law. The ADAAA would, however, would make clear that employers are not required to provide reasonable accommodations to persons who are “regarded as” being disabled but who do not actually have a disability.

The bottom line is that all employers should be aware that sweeping changes to the ADA are likely coming soon. These changes will result in more individuals being covered by the ADA and its protections. Employers should pay close attention to the status of S. 3406 and attempt to be aware of when these changes will go into effect and affect their organization’s practices. If the ADAAA is passed, employers are likely going to face more instances in which they need to provide accommodations to employees who might not have been considered disabled in the past, but who are considered disabled under the new law. Employers should study the new law once the final version is passed and make the appropriate changes to their workplace policies and procedures.

AGOSNET is committed to providing employers with the most proactive and responsive risk management tools available. their products and services include claims and incident prevention, claims and incident management, hiring practices, workplace policies and procedures, reporting mechanisms, and training. Their robust desktop training programs, including sexual harassment, equipment safety, and school/workplace bullying, provides employers with a simple method for purchasing, delivering, and tracking employees progress.

When people experience different emotions such as being happy, excited, sad, and bored they tend to display certain body languages that reinforce those feelings. This can happen either on purpose or by accident, many times without even realizing it. As a manager or employer it can be extremely beneficial to recognize what emotions you tend to show and what impact that has on the person you are speaking to. Minimizing body language that can have a negative effect will help to get your point across in a more effective manner. A list of key gestures and what they mean provided by risk management group AGOSNET is:

What message is your face sending to others?

• Eye-rolling
  Eye-rolling communicates a put-down. It is often done in front of others in reference to a co-worker who can’t see the eye-roll, although for a particularly insulting message, it can be done face-to face.
• Side glances
  Usually executed with a head tilt and your lids slightly closed, this sends a message that you don’t trust or believe what a co-worker is saying.
• Looking up to the ceiling, as if to say, “Give me a break!”
  The message here, again, is a sarcastic, dismissive put-down.
• Bobbing your head
• When you bob your head impatiently when someone is talking to you, you send the message that you have no patience or interest in what they are saying

What message are your hands sending to others?

• Grooming yourself while someone is talking to you
  When you inspect your clothes and brush off lint, real or imagined, while someone is speaking to you, it is a way of dismissing the speaker. You are literally “brushing them off.”
• Checking your watch, cell phone or PDA
  This sends the message that something is more important than the person speaking to you. It sends a message of boredom and disrespect.
• Tossing documents
  Imagine being in a meeting, sitting around the conference table and the agenda gets to you with a toss of the hand from the person running the meeting. Sliding or spinning a document across a table to a co-worker is a message of dislike and disrespect.
• Fidgeting with pens, paperclips or doodling during conversation

This is another way of communicating that you want to move on or are distracted

What message is your language sending to others?

• Sighing (with or without lifting your shoulder) indicates boredom or disinterest.
• Talking on the side to someone else while the main speaker is speaking is rude to everyone in the room, not just to the main speaker.
• Walking out of the room while still talking
  When you turn away and leave a conversation in progress, the message sent is that you aren’t interested in the other person’s response.
• Asking loaded questions A loaded question is one that usually presupposes another problem. They often imply an accusation and can put a co-worker on the defensive.
  

HRSentry recently formed a strategic alliance with AGOS out of Tulsa Oklahoma, to provide desktop training across a variety of work and safety related issues. These training modules are available for purchase online with a subscription to HRSentry.

AGOS is a consulting practice committed to preventing and mitigating the effect of loss and litigation. The AGOS organization includes attorneys and other professionals with backgrounds in human resources, insurance, training, and information technology, along with a dedicated customer support staff.

Geared for managers/supervisors and employees, the modules include such hot button topics as sexual harassment, discrimination, theft, ADA, FMLA, as well as school and state specific training topics. In addition to these topics, a new safety training program will be released in the upcoming months.

AGOS The training programs complement the existing HRSentry online Human Resource courses for HR professionals being offered through Champlain College. As a company, HRSentry believes in the importance for organizations of all sizes to become HR compliant through the education of their employees. These alliances provide the means for this initiative to be carried out.

Every year the United States Department of Labor releases a report on workplace safety that includes injury and illness rates. Knowing what your industries injury rate is and what tools can be used to reduce your risk can save thousands of unnecessary dollars in fines and lawsuits.

Industry 2006 annual average employment(in thousands)/Incidence Rate2005/2006

Nonclay refractory manufacturing 6.3 / – / 16.9
Motor home manufacturing 21.1 / – / 16.8
Iron foundries 58.4/ 17.1 / 15.1
Light truck and utility vehicle manufacturing 69.3 / 17.8 / 14.6
Prefabricated wood building manufacturing 27.2 / 14.3 / 14.3
Truck trailer manufacturing 38.5 / 16.8 / 13.9
Manufactured home (mobile home) manufacturing 49.1 / 12.9 / 13.2
Skiing facilities 34.0 / – / 13.2
Travel trailer and camper manufacturing 48.7 / 14.1 / 13.1
Sports teams and clubs 63.2 / – / 12.8
Animal (except poultry) slaughtering 146.3 / 12.6 / 12.5
Steel foundries (except investment) 20.9 / 10.7 / 12.1
Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) 22.5 / 13.3 / 12.1
Metal tank (heavy gauge) manufacturing 27.1 / – / 11.9
Motor vehicle body manufacturing 66.9 / 8.3 / 11.8
Beet sugar manufacturing 6.1 / 18.3 / 11.7
Amusement and theme parks 137.0 / – / 11.7
Couriers 528.0 / 12.4 / 11.0
Ambulance services 127.3 / – 11.0
Iron and steel forging 27.0 / 13.3 / 10.9
Heavy duty truck manufacturing 37.6 / 13.1 / 10.9
Scheduled passenger air transportation 426.8 / – / 10.8
Ship building and repairing 91.7 / 10.9 / 10.7
Soft drink manufacturing 79.7 10.4 10.6
Household furniture (except wood/metal) manufacturing 6.5 / – / 10.6
Private industry 111,273.1 / 4.6 / 4.4

Visit the Department of Labor homepage to see more stats on workplace incidents reports. For more information on risk management solutions, visit the HRSentry Homepage.