The US Department of Labor (DOL) is stepping up efforts to crack down on the misclassification of workers as independent contractors rather than as employees. According to its press release, the DOL, in partnership with the IRS, has signed memorandums of understanding (MOU) with agencies or officials in 11 states (Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Utah, and Washington, Hawaii, Illinois, and Montana, and New York.) The intent is to provide better information sharing as well as enforcement efforts aimed at employers that misclassify workers.
There is a strong financial motivation for employers to hire independent contractors rather than employees in the avoidance of a number of expenses: social security and Medicare taxes, unemployment and workers’ compensation premiums, overtime pay and employee benefits. Yet, classifying workers as independent contractors should always be done carefully, particularly in light of heightened scrutiny. There are somewhat different standards related to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and used by the IRS. Under the FLSA, courts have looked at the following factors:
1. The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
2. The permanency of the relationship
3. The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
4. The nature and degree of control by the principal.
5. The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
6. The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
7. The degree of independent business organization and operation.
The IRS looks at the degree of control and independence the worker has related to the following three categories:
1. Behavioral: Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job?
2. Financial: Are the business aspects of the worker’s job controlled by the payer? (these include things like how worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, who provides tools and supplies, etc.)
3. Type of Relationship: Are there written contracts or employee type benefits (i.e. pension plan, insurance, vacation pay, etc.?) Will the relationship continue and is the work performed a key aspect of the business?
Employers would be well-advised to review both sets of standards in relation to its hiring of independent contractors. Further guidance is available at IRS.gov and DOL.gov.





![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=1c84d48d-6248-4209-8cfb-b836413ca9a8)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e3040882-3e58-47fe-9a1d-54b07931b2ff)