Increased Scrutiny on Credit Checks for Potential Employees

As the unemployment rate rises and salaries are cut, people are finding it harder and harder to make all their monthly payments on time.  The result has been a renewed focus on the practice of performing credit checks for potential employees during the hiring phase.

The following appeared on HRTechnews.com and provides a good overview of how to use credit checks legally:

  • Not getting authorization – The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires companies to get applicants’ consent before obtaining a credit report. Also, applicants must be notified when they’re rejected because of a credit report.
  • Ignoring a possible disparate impact – The EEOC has said legitimate screening practices can be discriminatory when they accidentally weed out members of a protected class. That means if, for example, most of applicants rejected by the credit check are minorities, the company might be sued even if the bias was unintentional.
  • Using it too much – One way to limit liability of using a credit check to screen job applicants: Only use it when you have to. Most employers just look at credit checks for financial jobs.

Beyond legal issues, some experts say companies should stop taking credit scores into account in the current economy. Bad credit is on the rise, which means many otherwise qualified candidates could be turned down because of situations outside their control.

If you are a company looking to ensure you are legally compliant with your background checks, visit HRSentry and type “Credit Checks” into the search field located toward the bottom of the page in the center column.  This will give you an overview of the federal and state-specific resources available.

March Madness in the Office

Every year workers spend countless hours filling out and perfecting their tournament brackets and keeping pace up to the minute with all the action. There is a lot of talk about the impact that this process has on the productivity of an organization and its workers. Experts and researchers are always moaning and groaning about the money lost and what needs to be done to cut down on the time spent with the brackets and games. You can read reports published by Careerbuilder and other business resources listing off facts and figures with cynical conclusions being drawn about the negative impact it is having. While people may indeed be spending paid time watching and following the tournament, there are definitely good things that can be said as well. The office pools and “watercooler” conversations provide valuable bonding time between employees that many times involve management as well. Fighting the event will more than likely result only in employees sneaking around(March Madness OnDemand features a “boss” button that has a fake spreadsheet that will be pulled up to make it appear you are doing work) and feeling ‘snubbed’ by management. As much as it would be easiest to endorse these activities seen as commonplace and harmless, the law prohibits workplace gambling. Many organizations include a policy stating cases will be dealt with on a discretionary basis thinking they will be able to say they have a policy but not enforce it. Organizations should recognize that even when a policy is in place if it is shown that they knew gambling took place they can be held accountable. While there is no clear solution for this issue it does raise some interesting questions. So as the pools fill up and the brackets become littered with scratch marks, here are some interesting figures to think about.

  • Over 40 million workers have participated in office pools conducted during paid hours
  • Almost 2 million of those will watch games online from their desk
  • If these workers spend only 10 minutes a day(A decidedly low number) on the march madness festivities the total loss over the 16 days would be $1.7 billion

New I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service have issued a new I-9 form dated 2/2/09. However, it states that the 6/05/07 form is only for use before April 3, 2009, and that the new 2/2/09 form is only for use on and after April 3, 2009. HRSentry for the time-being will have both forms available for you, and will remove the 6/5/07 upon its expiration date.

Here are some of the changes:

  • All documents used for verification must be current and unexpired.
  • Removed from List A Documents:  Temporary resident Card (Form I-688); Employment Authorization cards (I-688A and I-688B) because these documents are no longer used.
  • Added to List A Documents: U.S. Passport Card; Foreign Passport with Temporary I-551 printed notation on a machine-readable immigrant visa; References to Form I-94 or I-94A (Arrival Departure Records); Passport from the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) with a valid Form I-94 or I-94A reflects an agreement under the Compact of Free Association between the US and FSM or RMI.

Protect yourself today with HRSentry’s I-9 Compliance Kit.  All the forms, resources, and procedures you need to ensure your organizations long-term success.